Aging and Disease  2020 , 11 (5): 1174-1191 https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2020.0608

Review Article

Stem Cell Based Therapy Option in COVID-19: Is It Really Promising?

Irmak Duygu Koyuncu12*, Darıcı Hakan123, Karaöz Erdal1234

1Istinye University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology & Embryology, Istanbul, Turkey
2Istinye University, Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering R&D Center, Istanbul, Turkey
3Istinye University, 3D Bioprinting Design & Prototyping R&D Center, Istanbul, Turkey
4Liv Hospital, Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies Center (LivMedCell), Istanbul, Turkey

通讯作者:  Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Duygu Koyuncu Irmak, İstinye University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Histology & Embryology, İstanbul, TURKEY. Email: duygu.irmak@istinye.edu.tr.Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Duygu Koyuncu Irmak, İstinye University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Histology & Embryology, İstanbul, TURKEY. Email: duygu.irmak@istinye.edu.tr.

收稿日期: 2020-05-25

修回日期:  2020-06-6

接受日期:  2020-06-8

网络出版日期:  2020-10-01

版权声明:  2020 this is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

展开

Abstract

The COVID-19 patients were first detected in China, in December 2019, then the novel virus with associated pneumonia and other diseases spread quickly to worldwide becoming a serious public health intimidation. Despite all the efforts, the pharmacological agents used for controlling or treating the disease, especially respiratory problems, have not been accomplished so far. Among various treatment options, mesenchymal stem cell-based cellular therapies are being investigated, because of their regeneration ability and multipotency along with other features like immunomodulation, antifibrosis and anti-inflammatory effects. This paper intends to analyze the current clinical trials on stem cell treatment of novel virus, searching and reviewing the available information and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) of World Health Organization (WHO). We concluded that the stem cell treatment of COVID-19 is found promising with pilot studies’ results, but still in the early development phase. There is an urgent need for large-scale investigations to confirm and validate the safety and efficacy profile of these therapies with reliable scientific evidence.

Keywords: Stem cell ; treatment ; COVID-19 ; clinical ; trials

0

PDF (647KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 收藏文章

本文引用格式 导出 EndNote Ris Bibtex

Irmak Duygu Koyuncu, Darıcı Hakan, Karaöz Erdal. Stem Cell Based Therapy Option in COVID-19: Is It Really Promising?[J]. Aging and Disease, 2020, 11(5): 1174-1191 https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2020.0608

It has been more than a century, since 1918 in?uenza pandemic unsettled thousands. At the beginning of 2020, the world suddenly faced another pandemic, with a new coronavirus outbreak which is still spreading all over the world, running over all the borders.

World Health Organization (WHO) named the novel virus as SARS-CoV-2 on February 11, 2020, which also called as, 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) and the associated disease as Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) [1].

The warning of WHO emphasized that COVID-19 is a global health emergency, public enemy number 1 and potentially more powerful than terrorism (NEWS A: WHO warns coronavirus, now dubbed COVID-19, is 'public enemy number 1' and potentially more powerful than terrorism’. Broadcasted on Feb 12 2020 in the internet; accessible at: www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-12/coronavirus-public-enemy-number-onevaccine/11956446). By the time of this paper is written, the outbreak spread all over the world and near 184 other countries all over the world, and the total COVID-19 infection confirmed cases are 2,567,327, total death is 177,521, and total of recovered people are 687,456 as reported by Johns Hopkins guides (Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases Dashboard by Johns Hopkins CSSE; www.hopkinsguides.com/hopkins/view/Johns_Hopkins_ABX_Guide/540747/all/Coronavirus_COVID_19__SARS_CoV_2_).

One of the well-known facts about SARS-CoV infection is that it leads the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in severe cases [2]. In some patients, ARDS induces severe pneumonia, and in more severe cases the Multi Organ Dysfunction (MOD) which is currently causing panic all over the world [3]. Despite all the efforts, the pharmacological agents used for controlling or treating the disease, especially curing the respiratory problems, have not been fully successful so far. Among various treatment options, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based cellular therapies are being investigated, because of MSC’s regeneration ability though limitless self-renewal and multipotency along with other features like immunomodulation, antifibrosis and anti-inflammatory effects [4, 5, 6]. Notwithstanding, there has not been a certain consensus on MSC therapy reliability in treating the SARS-CoV-2 induced ARDS or pneumonia in the scientific community.

The aim of this paper is, taking the SARS-CoV-2 infection and stem cell treatment approaches together as main focus all over the world:-to review the published clinical trials information and-to analyze the registered clinical trials information in International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) of WHO and the partner registries providing to this joint registry-to interpret on the strengths and hurdles of the stem cell treatment option in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients under the light of the available scientific evidence.

Etiopathogenesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Breeze or Storm of Cytokines

The CoV subfamily is composed of large, enveloped viruses with a single strand of sense RNA. Among these, the alpha and beta-CoVs are known to infect humans [7, 8]. While they usually cause mild respiratory infection symptoms, the first coronavirus epidemic in 2002 by SARS-CoV and in 2012 by Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) lead to severe and even fatal symptoms [9].

Coronavirus, named after the spike-like glycoproteins (S proteins) surrounding the viral envelope like a crown [10]. These S proteins binds the virus to its cellular receptors, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS-CoV and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in MERS-CoV, with subsequent membrane fusion [11]. Cell cytoplasm meets the viral RNA genome, then the viral genome is replicated. The virion-containing vesicles consists of genomic RNA, envelope glycoproteins and nucleocapsid proteins develops, then fuses with the plasma membrane, resulting in the release of the viruses [12]. SARS-CoV-2, was found to be a new type of beta-CoV with more than 99.98% genetic identity similarity to SARS-like coronaviruses and was reported as genetically more identical to SARS-CoV than to MERS-CoV [13, 14].

Another reported structural aspect of SARS-CoV-2 is that its ability to form a novel short protein encoded by orf3b region. It has been suggested that the orf3b of SARS-CoV-2 possibly play a role in the viral pathogenicity and inhibit the expression of IFNβ [15].

The expression of ACE2 is most abundant in endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells in the organs, facilitates the spreading of the virus as it enters the blood circulation. Also, since the ACE2 receptor is quite common in cell membrane, they especially exist particularly in the Alveolar Type 2 progenitor (AT2) cells in the lungs as well as in the kidneys, heart, liver, and digestive organs [16, 17, 18]. All tissues and organs expressing ACE2 receptors are the targets of the SARS-CoV and the fighting immune cells. Consequently, besides ARDS, caused by the damaged lung cells, the infected patients might also experience acute myocardial injury, arrhythmia, acute kidney injury, shock, and death from multiple organ failure [19, 20].

Inflammation is of crucial importance for effective immune response in order to succeed in resolution of infection and cell damages. The in?ammatory response, here we may use breeze term, is responsible for initial recognition of an infection, attracting the cells in charge to allow resolution. Hence the breeze is made by the inflammatory cells secretions which are many cytokines to serve to homeostasis [21]. If the immune system is over activated due to the viral overload, a quite large number of inflammatory factors are secreted, and severe cytokine storm develops [19-23]. IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα are the factors mainly causing the cytokine storm. Later, edema and then ARDS develops. If secondary infections make the cases much more severe [20].

As this new viral pandemic is totally new for human being, currently science community learns about the immunity and susceptibility of the population, taking the knowledge from the previous studies on other coronavirus infections as base and combining all reported new cases and research outcomes.

SARS- CoV-2 might interfere the immune pathways at least in two levels: as innate and adaptive immunity responses (Fig. 1). When the virus invades the host, the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), Toll-like receptors (TLR), NOD-like receptors (NLR), and RIG-I- like receptors (RLR) work on the recognition of the virus by innate immune system. The virus promotes dendritic cells maturation, expression of the inflammatory factors, and type I interferons (IFNs) release. These induce macrophage function and thus viral invasion restriction [24]. SARS- CoV’s N protein can induce the interference of the immune process by supporting the virus run off the immune responses [25]. As parts of the adaptive immune system, the main actors, CD4+ T cells work by stimulating B cells to produce virus-specific antibodies, while CD8+ T cells directly kill virus-infected cells. On the other hand, T helper cells secrete the proinflammatory cytokines to support the defense of the body. Anyhow, nCoV is able to suppress the function of T cells by inducing their apoptosis. On the other hand, if the immune system is overreacted, local reactive free radicals may provoke severe damages to the organs, particularly to the lungs [26].

   

Figure 1.   Demonstration of the SARS-CoV impact during the general immune reaction function. (PRRs: pattern recognition receptors, TLR: Toll-like receptor, NLR: NOD)-like receptors, RLR: retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors, IFN: Interferone).

Stem Cells as An Option Curing SARS-CoV Induced Pulmonary Impairment

Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are the most exciting cell-based therapeutic applications [27]. In these approaches, the cells are utilized for replacing or rebuilding the damaged organs and tissues [28, 29]. At the beginning stages of the cellular therapies, the methods of administering the cells into the injured tissue areas, such as skeletal myocytes injected into post-myocardial infarction scar tissue or neuronal cells into the brain of patients with Parkinson’s disease [30, 31]. The other methodologies are using the extracorporeal organ replacement for acute renal failure or fulminant acute liver failure, skeletal stem cell implantation for bone regeneration, which are already under clinical application [33, 34]. As the considerable amount of evidence has been obtained from basic research and its translation towards the clinical research, MSCs placed in medical practice as an alternative treatment option as safe and effective cell-based therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as graft versus-host disease (GVHD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [34-37].

Obviously, stem cell treatment has not yet been studied in a detailed manner in wide range of patients in multinational well-designed studies in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome or pneumonia cases caused by SARS-CoV, except for some pilot studies.

MSCs have been demonstrated to improve organ functions in cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and multiple other disorders. Another function of stem cell is their ability to regulate the inflammatory response and promote tissue repair and regeneration. MSCs perform their therapeutic effects mainly in two ways:-Proliferation and differentiation abilities for organ regeneration upon damage.-immunomodulatory effects viaThe paracrine secretion of many cytokine types,Conducting messages via crosstalk with immune cells including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and natural killer cells leading to immunomodulationThrough extracellular vesicles, mainly exosomes.

One suggested function of stem cells is their ability to regulate the inflammatory response and promote tissue repair and regeneration. MSCs have been demonstrated to improve organ functions in cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and multiple other disorders [34-37].

Attractivity of the MSCs as treatment agents, in addition to their cellular characteristics mentioned above, is coming from their wide range of sources. MSCs can be isolated from different adult and neonatal tissues. Adult bone marrow, peripheral blood (PB) and various adipose tissues (AT) can be used as roots, whereas umbilical cord blood, Warton jelly and cord itself, amniotic fluid, placenta can be the neonatal sources of these cells. Their low-invasive usability of MSCs in the clinics is also a promising feature of the treatment. Also, menstrual blood-derived MSC is attracting interest in experimental efforts [38-41].

There have been some evidence suggesting that the MSC therapy has considerable superiority when compared with other treatments in for example, skin diseases [42].

Evidence also suggests that the umbilical cord derived MSC exosomes which are extracellular vesicles of 40-100nm in size, have the same functionality as MSCs, with some superiority MSCs injection complications [43]. MSC exosomes show CD9, CD63, CD81 markers expression, and contain some cytokines including high levels of IL-6 and IL-8. These exosomes stimulate cell proliferation and protection against H2O2 induced apoptosis [44] also reported as having no harmful e?ects on the kidneys and liver. Some studies present evidence on as systemic anaphylaxis, hemolysis, pyrogen, hematology indexes, vascular and muscle stimulation suggest that the exosomes maybe evaluated as safe therapeutic mediators [45]. Some other evidence also reported by a number of investigators in regards to the exosome therapy in kidney diseases [46, 47], ocular disease [48, 49], Alzheimer’s disease [50, 51], spinal cord injury [52, 53] and acute myocardial ischemia [54, 55].

When it comes to finding effective and safe cures for the patients suffering from COVID-19, the research hypotheses were set generally around the idea that MSCs as treatment agents can be effective to prevent the cytokines’ storm over the immune system and to promote tissue repair endogenously by reparative capabilities of these cells. When infused in intravenous route, MSCs joins to the pulmonary tissue and induce the recovery of the pulmonary cellular level impairment and treat lung dysfunction and COVID-19 pneumonia [19, 56].

Clinical Trials Registries as Source of Key Investigational Information

All stakeholders having involved in all stages of the clinical trials, such as doctors, scientists, industry, academics, and most importantly the patients, share a common right and eagerness for a vigorous clinical research enterprise that brings innovations to all parties as quickly and as transparently as possible. The transparency in clinical research involves registration of clinical trials on public databases, accessibility of patient data for subsequent analysis, and publication of results irrespective of the trial outcome. The publicly available clinical trial data over registries keeps all parties involved in the clinical trials up to date on the recent medical research trends and results even before they are published. It is of crucial importance to have transparent results to ensure that decisions related to the safety and efficacy of investigated treatment or prevention approaches to be used in human are supported by the best-available scientific evidence. Evidence-based public health decisions and strategies ensure, in turn, an optimal allocation of public health resources and, ideally, better patient outcomes (https://www.ecrin.org/node/583 access 24 April 2020).

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) is an initiative of World Health Organization (WHO) established with the purpose of ensuring the accessibility of clinical research by all involved parties. Thus, the initiative is serving for improving not only the transparency but also the validity and reliability of the trials in means of scientific evidence worldwide (www.who.int/ictrp/en/ access 18 April 2020).

WHO Registry, ICTRP, is maintained by a network meeting the specific criteria for content, quality and validity, accessibility, unique identification, technical capacity and administration International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The partners and data providers of the ICTRP are listed Table 1 with the web sites.

   

Table 1   Clinical trials and web sites.

Registry of Clinical trialsWeb Site
1Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)http://www.anzctr.org.au/
2Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBec)http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/
3Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR)http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx
4Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Koreahttp://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php
5United States National Library of Medicinehttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov
6Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI)http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php
7Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials (RPCEC)http://registroclinico.sld.cu/en/home
8EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR)https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/
9German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS)https://www.drks.de/drks_web/
10Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT)https://www.irct.ir/
11Japan Primary Registries Network (JPRN)https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/
12Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR)http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/
13Lebanese Clinical Trials Registry (LBCTR)http://lbctr.emro.who.int/Trials/View#
14The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR)https://www.trialregister.nl/
15Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR)https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/
16Peruvian Clinical Trial Registry (REPEC)https://ensayosclinicos-repec.ins.gob.pe/en/
17Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry (SLCTR)http://www.slctr.lk/

新窗口打开

The COVID-19 pandemic has alerted the WHO, in a number of areas, including public health warnings, preventive actions recommendations, and follow up the cases’ data to release. Among these, the ICTRP registry of clinical trials become one of the major sources to track the clinical trials investigating the safe and effective cure’s for COVID-19 catastrophe.

Method and Analysis

The focus of this paper is reviewing the published and unpublished information about the clinical trials having the stem cell therapy on COVID-19. For this purpose, the published literature search was made in the PubMed and Google Scholar, and the registry searching of the clinical trials is done through the ICTRP where 17 registry data bases have been contributing in (Table-1).

The key words “COVID-19 OR Coronavirus OR New Coronavirus OR SARS-CoV-19 AND stem cell AND Treatment” were used in all levels. The date of search is 18 April 2020. The clinical research, regardless of being published or not, are selected where the phase of the trials are mentioned clearly, so all observational, basic sciences, diagnostic test, epidemiologic research, expanded access, health services research, prevention, prognosis, and screening trials are excluded whereas the interventional and treatment trials which are active recruiting or not yet recruiting are selected.

A further selection is done for trials mainly on stem cell treatment, so the trials with other interventions are excluded. The trial selection in ICTRP database is demonstrated in Figure 2.

The analysis of the data is done to find out the trend of the trials’ treatment targets over stem cell usage, the participant selection preferences, eligibility and primary trial outcome planning along with the methodology of the trials.

Findings

Total 16 trials registered in ICTP are selected for review and analysis. The trials with titles and identification numbers (ID) are listed in Table 2. This table also shows the enrolment status and the age range defined per trial.

Majority of the studies were actively recruiting (11), while some of the studies (5) were not yet recruiting so far.

   

Figure 1.   First step trial selection by searching in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) of WHO with COVID-19, Coronavirus, New Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-19 key words. The clinical trials are either excluded or selected based on the study type (interventional and treatment trials are selected) and study phase (only the trials whose phase of development mentioned are selected. The further selection is done by the additional key word of stem cell and finally 16 trials are selected as a result of first step trial selection. (search date: 18 April 2020)

Phases/Indication/Condition

We specified that all trials selected are of early development phases; there were no phase 3 or 4 studies in the registries.

Early phase 1 (formerly called phase 0) which is early exploratory study phase was the development stage of one randomized controlled non-blinded trial (ChiCTR2000029569).

Phase 1 (First in human safety) design was used in one parallel controlled (ChiCTR2000029569), one parallel open label (NCT04252118), one single arm (NCT04276987), and three single arm open label (NCT04313322, NCT04315987, NCT04302519) trials.

Phase 1-2 (Safety and Therapeutic Confirmatory) design was the core of two randomized controlled triple blinded trials (NCT04339660, NCT04336254); one parallel controlled trial (ChiCTR2000029990), and one single arm open label trial (NCT04331613).

Phase 2 (Therapeutic Confirmatory) trials were one randomized controlled Quadruple ((Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) -blinded (NCT04288102), one parallel controlled (ChiCTR2000031430), and one single arm open label (NCT04269525) trials.

Almost all of the trials selected have the common purpose of treating the SARS-CoV related pneumonia or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Participants/patients perspective

The age range selected in the trials was non-paediatric subjects for all studies and reaching outcome measures in the adult population is targeted. Only one trials shows the minimum age rage as 16 years (ChiCTR2000030138), but rest takes the smallest age as 18. Maximum recruitment age was not defined in 3 trials, average of the remaining studies’ maximum age is 76.7.

   

Table 2   Selected trials in ICTP of WHO.

Trial IDPublic titleRecruitment StatusInclusion age
minmax
ChiCTR2000029569Safety and efficacy of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells conditioned medium in the treatment of severe and critically novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a randomized controlled trialNot Recruiting18-
ChiCTR2000030138Clinical Trial for Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Severe Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19)Not Recruiting1675
ChiCTR2000029990Clinical trials of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of pneumonitis caused by novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19)Recruiting1895
ChiCTR2000030300Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) in the treatment of high-risk novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patientsRecruiting1875
ChiCTR2000031494Clinical study for stem cells in the treatment of severe novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19)Recruiting1890
ChiCTR2000031430Clinical study of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) induced pulmonary fibrosisRecruiting1880
NCT04252118Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment for Pneumonia Patients Infected With COVID-19Recruiting1870
NCT04276987A Pilot Clinical Study on Inhalation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exosomes Treating Severe Novel Coronavirus PneumoniaNot yet Recruiting1875
NCT04313322Treatment of COVID-19 Patients Using Wharton’s Jelly-Mesenchymal Stem CellsRecruiting18-
NCT04315987NestCell® Mesenchymal Stem Cell to Treat Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia (HOPE)Not yet Recruiting18-
NCT04331613Safety and Efficacy of CAStem for Severe COVID-19 Associated With/Without ARDSRecruiting1870
NCT04339660Clinical Research of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of COVID-19 PneumoniaRecruiting1875
NCT04336254Safety and Efficacy Study of Allogeneic Human Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Treat Severe COVID-19 PatientsRecruiting1865
NCT04288102Treatment With Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Severe Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Recruiting1875
NCT04302519Novel Coronavirus Induced Severe Pneumonia Treated by Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem CellsNot yet Recruiting1875
NCT04269525Umbilical Cord (UC)-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) Treatment for the 2019-novel Coronavirus (nCOV) PneumoniaRecruiting1875

新窗口打开

The gender is defined as both genders at all trials, except for one trial (ChiCTR2000030138).

Trial Methodology

The protocol design, development phases, participant size blinding status and the treatment intervention types to cure SARS-CoV infection of the randomized controlled trials are summarised in Table 3. There were 5 randomized controlled studies which are 1 non blinded (ChiCTR2000029569), 1 double blinded (ChiCTR 2000030138), 2 triple-blinded (NCT04339660, NCT 04336254) and 1 quadruple-blinded (NCT04288102) trials identified. (Table 3). All trials in this group combine the conventional or routine treatment with multiple MSCs’ infusions in varying doses, except for one trial where the routine treatment combination is mentioned only in control group not in the experimental group (ChiCTR2000030138).

The rest of the trials are 3 Parallel controlled studies (ChiCTR2000029990, ChiCTR2000031494, ChiCTR 2000031430), (Table 4) 1 parallel Open label study (NCT04252118), 1 Single arm trial (NCT04276987), and 5 single arm open label trials (NCT04313322, NCT04315987, NCT04331613, NCT04302519, NCT 04269525) (Table 5).

1 Case Series trial (ChiCTR2000030300) was cancelled during this clinical trials’ analysis with justification of “Cancelled by the investigator Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) in the treatment of high-risk novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients”.

   

Table 3   The randomised controlled trials along with their development phases, participant size blinding status and the treatment intervention types to cure SARS-CoV infection in ICTP database of WHO.

Protocol design: Selected Trials with Randomized Controlled Design
Trial IDPhase / Target participantsBlindingIntervention
ChiCTR2000029569Phase 0 /
30 subjects
Open labelExperimental group: conventional treatment combined with umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cellconditioned medium group
Control group: Conventional treatment
NCT04339660Phase 1-2 /
30 Subjects
Triple-blindedExperimental group: conventional and treatment with umbilical cord MSCs,
1x106 UC-MSCs /kg body weight suspended in 100mL saline Control group: conventional treatment and Placebo intravenously. Placebo 100mL saline intravenously
NCT04336254Phase 1-2 /
20 Subjects
Triple-blindedExperimental group: allogeneic human dental pulp stem cells
Intravenous injection of 3.0x107 human dental pulp stem cells solution (30ml) on day 1, day 4 and day 7, based on routine treatment of COVID-19 Control group: Intravenous saline injection as Placebo Intravenous injection of 3ml of 0.9% saline on day 1, day 4 and day 7, based on routine treatment of COVID-19
NCT04288102Phase 2 /
90 Subjects
Quadruple-blindedExperimental Group: Conventional treatment plus 3 times of MSCs(4.0x107 cells per time) intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6.
Control Group: Saline containing 1% Human serum albumin (solution of MSC) 3 times of placebo (intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6)Other: Intravenous saline injection (Placebo) Intravenous injection of 3ml of 0.9% saline on day 1, day 4 and day 7, based on routine treatment of COVID-19
ChiCTR2000030138Phase 2 /
60 subjects
Double BlindedExperimental group: Intravenous injection of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC); Note: routine treatment combination was not mentioned in the other records.
Control Group: Routine treatment + placebo

新窗口打开

Intervention

In all selected trials selected, the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are used as biological treatment agent. The sources of the MSCs used in the trials selected as follow:-Umbilical cord-Wharton Jelly-Human dental pulp-Embryonic origin

In one trial MSCs-derived exosomes are used. We also identified one trial using commercially manufactured MSC, namely NestCell®.

All forms of the MSCs are planned to given to the patients as intravenous infusion, except one trial (NCT04276987) in which the exosomes of MSCs are given by inhalation; as single to multiple applications with one- or two-days intervals up to 21-28 days (Table 6).

   

Table 4   The Parallel Controlled Design along with their development phases, participant size blinding status and the treatment intervention types to cure SARS-CoV infection in ICTP database of WHO.

Protocol design: Selected Trials with Parallel Controlled Design
Trial IDPhaseTotal target ParticipantsIntervention
ChiCTR2000029990Phase 1-2120 SubjectsExperimental group: mesenchymal stem cells.
Control group: saline. Note: Randomly divided into group A as placebo group and group B as stem cell treatment group
ChiCTR2000031494Phase 136 SubjectsExperimental group: Conventional medication + Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells;
Control group: Conventional medication.
ChiCTR2000031430Phase 2200 SubjectsExperimental group: Conventional treatment regimen + MSC treatment;
Control group: Conventional treatment regimen.

新窗口打开

   

Table 5   The trials with other design characteristics along with their development phases, participant size blinding status and the treatment intervention types to cure SARS-CoV infection in ICTP database of WHO.

Protocol design: Selected Trials with Other Design Characteristics
Trial IDPhase / Target ParticipantsDesignIntervention
NCT04252118Phase 1 /
20 Subjects
parallel open labelExperimental Group: 3 times of MSCs (3.0*10E7 MSCs intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6).
Control Group: Without MSCs Therapy but conventional treatment should be received.
NCT04276987Phase 1 /
30 Subjects
Single armMSCs-derived exosomes
(5 times aerosol inhalation of MSCs-derived exosomes (2.0*10E8 nano vesicles/3 ml at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5).)
NCT04313322Phase 1 /
5 Subjects
Single arm
open label
WJ-MSCs will be derived from cord tissue of newborns, screened for HIV1/2, HBV, HCV, CMV, Mycoplasma, and cultured to enrich for MSCs.
NCT04315987Phase 1 /
66 Subjects
single arm
open label
NestCell® is a mesenchymal stem cell therapy produced by Cellavita
NCT04331613Phase 1-2 /
9 Subjects
single arm
open label
CAStem will be administered intravenously.
Human Embryonic Stem Cells Derived M Cells (CAStem) A dose-escalation with 3 cohorts with 3 patients/cohort who receive doses of 3, 5 or 10 million cells/kg. If there are no safety concerns for each cohort, the dose will be escalated from lower dose to next higher dose.
NCT04302519Phase early 1 /
24 Subjects
single arm
open label
Dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells
On the basis of clinical standard treatment, the injection of dental mesenchymal stem cells was increased on day 1, 3 and 7 of the trial.

新窗口打开

Primary Study Objectives and Outcome:

We found out that the selected clinical trials have the clinical trial objectives and trial outcomes defined in conjunction to the objectives. The study outcomes are defined as primary and secondary ones, as it is the case in the study objectives. Taking the fact that a sensible strategy in a study is to establish a single primary research question around which to focus the study plan, we evaluated the study objectives versus primary study outcomes listed in the registry in this paper.

ChiCTR2000029569: This study’s target patient population is severe and critical 2019-ncov coronavirus pneumonia. The main objective is to determine the effectiveness and safety of the conventional treatment versus conventional plus UC-MSC treatment. The study has the outcome measure Pulmonary Severity Index (PSI) to get the data.

ChiCTR2000030138: This trial is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UC-MSCs in the treatment of 2019-nCoV infected pneumonia patients. In this trial the severity of the disease state is not specified. The outcome measure is taken as clinical index for obtaining outcome.

ChiCTR2000029990: This is also an effectiveness and safety study having target cases as treatment of new coronavirus pneumonitis not specifying the severity of the clinical appearance. Improved respiratory system function and recovery time as demonstrated by the level of blood oxygen saturation is the outcome measure.

ChiCTR2000030300: (Cancelled study during this paper’s analysis) The trial has the objective of evaluating the clinical effect of UC-MSCs in high risk of novel coronavirus pneumonia patients to support treatment and to improve the pulmonary fibrosis in the later stage. The safety is not listed as objective. The outcome measures are listed as time to disease recovery, time and rate of coronavirus become negative, and exacerbation (transfer to RICU) time;". This trial’s cancellation reason was not declared in the registry.

ChiCTR2000031494: This is another trial having objective of evaluating if the UC-MSCs have efficacy and more benefits in treating Corona Virus Disease 2019. As the outcome points are listed as chest imaging, lung function, and ADL, it is understood that the outcome measures are simply of pulmonary status. However, the clinical appearance of the disease, or any severity definition is not included in the study records.

ChiCTR2000031430: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of UC-MSCs in COVID-19 induced pulmonary fibrosis treatment. Electrocardiogram, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, Score, high resolution CT for chest, blood gas analysis, percutaneous blood oxygen saturation, 6 min walking distance, pulmonary function VCmax, blood routine, liver and kidney function, cytokine analysis, immunoglobulin, lymphocyte subsets, coagulation, myocardial enzymes, serum ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT), IL-6, lactic acid, D-Dimer, CRP are chosen as outcome measure showing that the trial’s expectation is to understand how the stem cell therapy make its impact in tissue level as indicated cytokines and parameters, also to find out if this therapy has a systematical adverse effect resulting in the multi organ biochemistry data changes.

   

Table 6   The MSC treatment doses, route of administration, treatment/ application intervals and target lung condition’s name and grade (mild, moderate, severe or critical).

Trial IDTherapyRouteDoseApplication intervalsCondition
ChiCTR2000029569Conventional treatment (CT) combined with UC-MSC conditioned mediumNot mentionedNot mentionedNot MentionedSevere or/to critical pneumonia diagnosis due to SARS-CoV infection
ChiCTR2000030138CT + UC-MSC
CT + placebo
IV injectionNot mentionedNot MentionedSevere Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia
ChiCTR2000029990MSCs or salineNot mentionedNot mentionedNot MentionedModerate to severe cases of new coronavirus pneumonia
ChiCTR2000030300 (Cancelled)(UC-MSCs)Not mentionedNot mentionedNot MentionedPatients with high risk
ChiCTR2000031494CT or CT plus UC-MSCsIVNot mentionedNot MentionedSevere novel coronavirus pneumonia
ChiCTR2000031430CT + UC-MSCsIV4*107 cells/applicationon days 0, 3, and 6 for a total of 3 timesNovel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) severity not mentioned
NCT04252118CT plus MSCsIV1*107cells/applicationat Day 0, Day 3, Day 6).Pneumonia Patients Infected With COVID-19 severity not mentioned
NCT04276987CT plus MSCs-derived exosomesaerosol inhalation1*108 nano vesicles/3 mlat Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5Severe or/to critical pneumonia diagnosis due to SARS-CoV infection
NCT04313322WJ-MSCsIV1*106 cells/kgThe three doses will be 3 days apart form each other. 3 weeks follow upCOVID-19 (ever, respiratory destress, pneumonia, cough, sneezing, diarrhea) severity not mentioned
NCT04313322WJ-MSCsIV1*10e6 cells/kgThe three doses will be 3 days apart form each other.COVID-19 (ever, respiratory destress, pneumonia, cough, sneezing, diarrhea) severity not mentioned.
NCT04315987CT plus MSCsIV2*107cells/applicationon days 1, 3 and 5 and if necessary on day 7Severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
NCT04331613CAStem, immunity- and matrix-regulatory cells (IMRCs), differentiated from hESCsIV3/5/10*106 cells/kg. Escalating doses.intervals not mentioned3 cohorts with 3 patients/cohort with severe COVID-19 associated w/wo ARDS.
NCT04339660CT plus MSCsIV1*106 cells/kg1 time, or with an interval of 1 weekCritically ill COVID-19 pneumonia
NCT04336254CT plus hDP-MSCsIV3*107cells/bag * 3 bagsinjection of on day 1, day 4 and day 7Severe pneumonia caused by COVID-19
NCT04288102CT plus MSCsIV4.0*107at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6.COVID-19 Patients with Severe Convalescence
NCT04302519CT plus hDP-MSCsIV1.0x106 cells /kg.on day 1, 3 and 7 of the trial.Novel Coronavirus Induced Severe Pneumonia
NCT04269525UC-MSCsIV3.3*107/50ml bags*3bag,on day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7.Serious Pneumonia and Critical Pneumonia Caused by the 2019-nCOV Infection

新窗口打开

NCT04252118: The safety and efficiency trial of MSCs treatment in pneumonia patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, is conducted to monitor the pneumonia improvement and side effects profile in certain times within 28 days of treatment. The adverse event monitoring is planned to continue as 6 months. The severity of pneumonia is not defined.

NCT04276987: This pilot trial is aimed to explore the safety and efficiency of using aerosol inhalation of the non-cellular exosomes derived from allogenic adipose MSCs as therapy agent in severe patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. Both efficiency and the safety are planned to be followed up to 28 days. The severity of pneumonia is not defined.

NCT04313322: This trial is conducted to investigate the potential effective use of Wharton’s Jelly MSCs for treatment of patient diagnosed with Corona Virus SARS-CoV-2 infection and showing symptoms of COVID-19. The clinical outcome is defined as improvement in clinical symptoms, improvement in pulmonary impairment as demonstrated by CT-Scan and the potential side effects by radiography, also the Real-Time PCR of Viral RNA positivity in 3 weeks. The severity of the disease is not defined.

NCT04315987: This trial is to assess the efficacyof commercial product NestCell® as an add-on therapy to standard treatment to treat patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The outcome measure is taken as the change in the clinical condition in 10 days. Collecting the safety is not among the main objectives of the trial.

NCT04331613: In this dose escalation, safety and early efficacy study, the CAStem product which is product composed of immunity- and matrix-regulatory cells (IMRCs) (M cells) differentiated from clinical-grade human embryonic stem cell is used. The trial is designed to use CAStem to treat severe COVID-19 associated with or without ARDS. Both frequency and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events are planned to be collected in 28 days along with changes in pulmonary imaging examinations.

NCT04339660: In order to find a potential effective cure alternative especially in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients, this trial is planned as adoptive transfer therapy of MSCs. The outcomes are focused on collection of the immune function data over cytokines, improvement and recovery time of inflammatory and immune factors, blood oxygen saturation, and evaluation of pneumonia change in 4 weeks of treatment.

NCT04336254: This safety and efficacy study is of allogeneic human dental pulp MSCs in the treatment trial of severe pneumonia cases caused by COVID-19. The objective is to explore the effects this treatment in terms of reducing mortality, improving clinical prognosis, and so discovering a new therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 using allogeneic human dental pulp MSCs. The primary outcome measure is defined as time to clinical improvement. The pulmonary evaluations, blood tests of immune function, and the adverse effects follow up is listed in secondary outcome measures not in primary ones.

NCT04288102: This clinical trial is designed to inspect the safety and efficiency of MSCs therapy in severe COVID-19 cases. Size of lesion area and severity of pulmonary fibrosis by imaging and functional tests, oxygen saturation, oxygenation index, duration of oxygen therapy, side effects, immunological characteristics (immune cells, inflammatory factors, etc.) are planned to be evaluated during the 90 days follow up. The safety outcome measures are listed in secondary outcomes.

NCT04302519: The study is on the evaluation of novel coronavirus induced severe pneumonia by dental pulp MSCs treatment. The study is focusing on the treatment efficiency as to be demonstrated by the disappearance time of ground-glass shadow in the lungs in 14 days.

NCT04269525: The trial is dealing with the serious pneumonia and critical pneumonia caused by the 2019-nCOV infection. This study is conducted to find out whether or not UC-MSCs treatment will function in 2019-nCOV infection pneumonia treatment, so this is another efficiency study. The outcome measure is defined as oxygenation index in 14 days.

Discussion

The COVID-19 patients were first detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, then the novel virus with associated pneumonia and other diseases spread quickly to worldwide becoming a serious public health intimidation [57, 58].

As experienced in the past, in two other lethal coronaviruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [60], novel virus SARS-CoV-2 over-stimulates the immune reactions in the host with concurrent cytokine storm (CS) which are followed by acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The clinical case worsens resulting in multiple organ failure and death [21, 60]. Even when the treatment in the intensive care units of CS cases goes well, the long-lasting inflammation causes serious pulmonary fibrosis, which in turn destines to the lung dysfunction and very low life-quality [61].

Currently, there are no specific drugs or vaccines are available to cure the patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, except the efforts for the existing drugs’ repurposing, such as the case of antiviral treatments already in the market, or supporting treatments [22, 62]. There is an enormous unmet medical need for a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia patients, associated systemic diseases, especially the severe or critically ill cases.

In this context, the MSCs and related cell-based therapy is considered as a promising option. the MSCs have been widely studied in basic research and clinical trials and these have been studied in a number of diseases [63, 64]. The published evidence reveals the safety and effectiveness of this therapeutic approach in a number of clinical trials, particularly in the immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as GVHD, and some incurable diseases [65], SLE [66] and multiple sclerosis [67]. The MSCs perform their function in tissue microenvironment over paracrine immunoregulatory interactions with CD4+ T lymphocytes [68].

There is reported superiority in using MSC therapy in comparison with other treatments [69]. On the other hand, this idea has not been accepted by the scientific community due to some concerns of lack of adequate evidence. Published evidence suggests that MSCs-based treatment, though, have some advantages along with some drawbacks which are illustrated in Table 7. Apart from these, there are certain bottlenecks in the research of the stem cell therapy concept that need to be overcome; this important topic will be the focus of another article.

Case reports of the SC therapy in COVID-19 disease is contributing a lot to the scientific evidence and shedding light to the clinical trial hypotheses. In the recent one, a severely ill COVID-19 patient with brain and multi-organ impairment was treated with WJ-MSCs, when the patient has not demonstrated any improvement with the conventional treatment, WJ-MSCs were transplanted to the patient four times intravenously. The authors reported that there were no side effects observed in the patient. Alleviation of the cytokine storm, improved pulmonary function accompanied by the improved other organ systems such as brain, opened the road of discharge of the patient with recovery and no adverse events due to the SC treatment [16].

   

Table 7   The Pros and Cons of MSCs use for treatment purposes in general*.

PROSComments on PROSCONSComments on CONS
AccessibilityThey are easily accessible and can be isolated from various tissuesCell SourcingThe cell-based therapies need the cells need to be expanded in large quantities while protecting their uniformity in activity and staying pathogen free. The use of human embryonic stem (ES) cells versus adult SCs is still a matter of debate. The current political decision makers strongly favoring adult stem cell option.
PotencyThey are multipotent stem cellsPlasticityAdult SCs have certain plasticity to transdifferentiate from one lineage pathway to another. Besides, instead of transdifferentiating with normal diploid chromosomal numbers, SCs may fuse with tissue-specific differentiated cells causing polyploidy. MSCs differentiation was reported to lead to tissue ossification or calcification in animal models which is also a potential risk in human use.
VolumeMSCs can easily expand to clinical volume in a suitable period of timeSafety Concerns of using transformed cellsIn children with adenosine deaminase deficiency, the autologous transplantation of genetically modified hematopoietic stem cells was reported to lead to severe immunodeficiency followed by acute leukemia in some of the patients. Nerve cells implantation in Parkinson’s disease patients was reported the high rate of severe and uncontrollable dyskinetic activity as adverse effect. Also, myoblast implantation into the heart tissue showed adverse event of increased rates of cardiac arrhythmias.
StorageMSCs can be stored for repetitive therapeutic usageChoosing autologous or non-autologous human cellsRegardless of the chosen method, each treatment has important regulatory and practical difficulties, and logistics of delivery can be another issue, i.e. to maintain the uniformity of cells, to avoid any contamination during cell processing.
No Reported Safety issuesClinical trials of MSCs so far haven’t shown adverse reactions to allogeneic MSC.Maintenance of cell viabilityThe nutrient and oxygen delivery to the cellular implant is of vital importance for viability of the cells. It has been still in experimental stage to use the neovascular capillary bed in and around the cell implant and intravascular cell encapsulation implant approach not having use in human in clinics.
EffectivenessEffectiveness of MSCs have been obviously documented in several clinical trials*The references used to compile the information for this table: 22, 33, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81.

新窗口打开

The ICTP database WHO, displays the clinical trial efforts on developing new therapy for COVID-19 disease. In 1135 trials in total dealing with COVID-19 treatment, only 16 trials have COVID-19 cure with stem cells, having defined certain clinical development phase (1,4%). Besides this relatively low interest, the development phases of the selected trials show that all the trials are in early development phases (Diagram 1). One trial is of phase 0 which is early phase 1 in current terms researching in the exploratory way; 8 trials are of phase 1 which is first in human safety studies; 4 trials are of phase 1 /2 meaning that these trials are fulfilling both phase objectives of determining early safety data along with collecting data on the efficiency of the treatment; 3 trials are in phase 2 investigating in the therapeutic confirmatory directions.

It is not surprising that there are no phase 3 trials yet, which is the step when the treatment is tested in thousands of patients across the world providing strong statistical evidence on effectivity and the safety of the treatment, in the database. This indicates that development phase progress has not reached to this level since the adequate amount of evidence to go forward has not been collected and reported so far due to at least time restrictions forced by the urgency of the cases effected by the novel coronavirus.

There are certain research tools used to minimize the research bias, including randomization, and blinding. The first published randomized controlled trial (RCT) appeared in the 1948 [70], and by the late 20th century, RCTs were recognized as the standard method for ‘rational therapeutics’ and ‘gold standard’ of evidence-based medicine [71]. When we evaluate the use of these tools in the selected trials on MSC treatment ofCOVID-19, there are 4 studies used both randomization and blinding (Table 3).

Two phase 1 / 2 studies having randomized triple blinding design of two arms. The umbilical MSCs (NCT04339660) and allogeneic human dental pulp MSCs (NCT04336254) are used, respectively. In both trials, the SC therapy is applied as add on therapy, to the conventional treatment, in a placebo controlled manner. The NCT04339660 trial is designed to provide proof for the efficiency with measures of inflammation and cytokine reactions of pulmonary healing,. Similarly, the NCT04336254 trial has the main aim to define the time to clinical improvement, and the adverse effects follow up is listed in secondary outcome measures not in primary ones.

The patient sampling size is quite small in these trials not allowing a reliable prediction for larger population. Also the primary outcome measures need to be reported in the registries when obtained and processed and need to be published so that the scientific society can syllogize the trial outcomes defined versus obtained.

Leng et. al, recently reported a pilot trial which was conducted as parallel design in seven patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with intravenous administration of clinical-grade human MSCs [72]. The placebo group consisted of three patients. Reportedly, the patients who are selected for their being in range of severe to critical conditions showed alleviation in all symptoms s by 2-4 days after receiving MSC infusion with no apparent adverse effects. These findings were supported by the abating pneumonia infiltration indicated in chest CT, and negative results for the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test in two weeks after infusion [72]. The mechanisms underlying the MSC infusion-led improvements in COVID-19 patients attributed to strong antiinflammatory action of MSCs. The evidence of this was obtained from multiple beneficial outcomes, including the increased number of peripheral lymphocytes, the decline in the C-reactive protein, and waning of overactivated cytokine-secreting immune cells (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells) by 3-6 days in the circulating blood [72, 73]. The improvement was found exciting, especially in elderly patient, which provided preliminary proof of efficacy and short term safety of the treatment. However, this trial has a very limited number of subjects, and the effectiveness of the treatment and adverse events follow up was done in a very short time period 2, 4, 6, 9, 14 days after treatment, not aiming to get long term effectiveness and safety data over long term study outcome measures.

This analysis is required further validation with a systemmatical approach of published and nonpublished clinical trials data with certain selection criteria.The treatment with MSCs of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was found safe and effective, especially critically severe cases, as reported by an investigator based on some review on clinical trials [74]. In a phase I, multi-center, open label, dose escalation study, [64] nine patients with moderate to severe ARDS were enrolled. The patients received a single intravenous allogeneic BM-MSCs infusion with low (1x106 MSCs/kg), intermediate (5x106 MSCs/kg) or high dose (10x106 MSCs/kg). No treatment-related clinical instability, adverse events or toxicity was reported at the doses tested. High dose BM-MSCs demonstrated better sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score than lower doses. But there were no significant differences in ARDS markers (IL-6, IL-8, ANGPT2, and AGER) detected in the samples.

In another trial, the intravenous administration of 2×106 cells/kg of allogeneic BM-MSCs was tested in two patients diagnosed with severe ARDS who did not improve with all supportive therapies. Gladsomely, along with the promising treatment safety results, the recovery from multiple organ failure and presentation of reduced epithelial apoptosis, alveolar-capillary fluid leakage, proinflammatory cytokines, miRNAs, and chemokines samples in both patients were reported (75).

In a double-blind, multi-center, randomized trial, BM-MSC treatment in ARDS was assessed [76]. A single intravenous dose of 10 × 106 BM-MSCs/ kg bw was given to 40 patients with moderate to severe ARDS. A well-known pulmonary and systemic vascular injury biomarker, Angiopoietin 2, is a well-recognized mediator and biomarker of pulmonary and systemic vascular injury was chosen to track the pulmonary function improvement and a strong correlation between this biomarker and cell viability and between viability and improvement in oxygenation index. The authors claimed the effective treatment in recovering patients in MSC group with no MSC-related hemodynamic or respiratory adverse events. The authors concluded that a single dose of intravenous BM-MSCs was safe in patients with moderate to severe ARDS and larger trials were needed to assess efficacy.

Hence, although the efficiency of the MSCs treatment offers promising evidence, there is still a gap in safety validation of the MSC therapy leading the scientists to be cautious in accepting the findings with inner peace. This explains why in nine out of sixteen trials in this paper have both efficacy and safety as the main objectives and primary outcome measures (ChiCTR2000029569, ChiCTR2000030138, ChiCTR2000029990, ChiCTR200 0031430, NCT04252118, NCT04276987, NCT04331 613, NCT04336254, NCT04288102). Given the fact that these trials are of early development phases, and have relatively small patient population, these trials’ results, study reports and more importantly the publications are awaited to get the insights about the outcome measures and how these provide proof particularly for safety profile.

The cancelled study during this paper’s preparation (ChiCTR2000030300) has no reason for cancellation in the registry, which needs to be another transparent data for all interested parties. More interestingly, the remaining six studies have objective and outcome measures of efficiency of the treatment, but not safety. Further study designing especially on effective treatment regimen, as well as validated safety evidence in long period of time will be enlightening the gaps.

In the trials selected in this analysis, the dose optimization and the treatment intervals are being tested mainly as conventional treatment plus UC-MSCs as 4×107/kg (ChiCTR2000031430), MSCs 3×107 /kg (NCT04252118), MSCs 1x106 cells/kg (NCT04339660) DP-MSCs 3×107 /kg (NCT04336254) WJ-MSCs 3X106/kg (NCT04313322 and NCT04313322), MSCs as 2x107 cells (NCT04315987) in route of intravenous infusion. MSCs-derived exosomes (NCT04252118) are tested over inhalation in 2.0x108 nano vesicles/3 ml. As seen, the doses of MSC infusions are still in experimental stage. Moreover, in trial NCT04331613, the design consisted of 3 cohorts with 3 patients per cohort, the dose is defined as 3, 5 or 10 million cells/kg; if there are no safety concerns for each cohort, the dose is planned to be escalated from lower dose to next higher dose.

Treatment intervals also seems a matter of investigation, since some trials select once in three days infusion for a total of three times, whereas some others prefer to give the infusion once in two days, following up the patients 21 or 28 days. On the other hand, in 5 trials both dose of the cell-based treatment and the treatment intervals were not mentioned in the registry, there are also some trials did not provide the target COVID-19 disease severity information, whereas some others mention that severe or critically ill cases as the target of the treatment (Table 6). In order to meet the trial outcome targets, the trials need to be evaluated with disease severity levels, the doses infused to the patients and the expected pulmonary improvement and safety indicators.

We consider this picture in a couple of ways: Firstly, the trial registry has not been used by all responsible parties to allow society to understand the doses and dosing intervals definition as we are missing information, like dose and treatment interval details, to get a general idea on dosing strategy. Secondly, used dosing regimens, dosing intervals and follow up durations vary among the trials, probably due to the experimental nature, sources, clinical-stage of the dose context of the MSCs. When the information on the severity of the COVID-19 target cases is not given in trial information, then the validity of the data needs to be justified since the disease is appearing in varying severities due to the individual differences [7, 77].

The cytokine storm and the relevant pulmonary and/or other tissue damages could vary depending on the age and the concomitant other chronic diseases [78, 79, 80, 81]. As the ages of the included patients almost at all selected trials, there is one more concern raise: Can the same dosing strategy be followed confidently at all ages between 18 and 76 (note: average of inclusion age maximum at all trials, except the ones that maximum age was mentioned as ‘older’ only).

In this paper, reviewing the published information and clinical trials’ data in WHO registry we suggest the following:-The pilot studies bring the promising cure option for COVID-19 cases with MSC therapy as add-on treatment into scientific society’s attention.-Early-stage clinical trials have demonstrated and keep focusing on the efficiency and safety of MSC treatment in COVID-19 patients. There is an urgent need for large-scale investigations to confirm and validate the safety and efficacy profile of these therapies with reliable evidence.-There is a need for ‘reloaded’ trial designs considering the randomization and blinding along with controlled setting for the MSCs treatment investigation in larger populations across the world taking the power of the evidence into account.-The registry of WHO need to be kept up-to-date with full trial design, protocol summary and also for progress of the trials for the sake of transparency in clinical trials’ data for all parties.

Acknowledgement

We thank Ms Oznur Baygut for her kind assistance helping to search for literature for the manuscript.


参考文献

[1] Velavan TP, Meyer CG (2020).

The COVID-19 epidemic

. Trop Med Int Health. 25:278-280.

[本文引用: 1]     

[2] Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. (2020).

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

. N Engl J Med, 382:1708-1720.

[本文引用: 1]     

[3] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. (2020).

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

. Lancet, 395(10223):497-506.

[本文引用: 1]     

[4] Zhou Y, Yamamoto Y, Xiao Z, Ochiya T (2019).

The Immunomodulatory Functions of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Mediated via Paracrine Activity

. J Clin Med, 8: 1025.

[本文引用: 1]     

[5] Demircan PC, Sariboyacı AE, Unal ZS, Gacar G, Subasi C, Karaoz E (2011).

Immunoregulatory effects of human dental pulp-derived stem cells on T cells: comparison of transwell co-culture and mixed lymphocyte reaction systems

. Cytotherapy, 13:1205-20.

[本文引用: 1]     

[6] Yilmaz S, Inandiklioglu N, Yildizdas D, Subasi C, Acikalin Aet al. (2013).

Mesenchymal Stem Cell: Does it Work in an Experimental Model with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?

Stem Cell Rev and Rep 9:80-92.

[本文引用: 1]     

[7] Ye Y, PhilipNP LagnitonSY, Enqin L, Ren-He X (2020).

COVID-19: What has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease

. Int J Biol Sci, 16(10):1753-66.

[本文引用: 2]     

[8] de Wilde AH, Snijder EJ, Kikkert M, van Hemert MJ (2018).

Host Factors in Coronavirus Replication

. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 419: 1-42.

[本文引用: 1]     

[9] Yan-Rong G, Qing-Dong C, Zhong-Si H, Yuan-Yang T, Shou-Deng C, et al. (2020).

The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak - an update on the status

, Military Medical Research, 7:11.

[本文引用: 1]     

[10] Singhal T (2020).

A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, 87(4):281-286.

[本文引用: 1]     

[11] Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Muller MA, Dijkman R, et al. (2013).

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC

. Nature, 495: 251-4.

[本文引用: 1]     

[12] Sevajol M, Subissi L, Decroly E, Canard B, Imbert I (2014).

Insights into RNA synthesis, capping, and proofreading mechanisms of SARS-coronavirus

. Virus Res, 194: 90-9.

[本文引用: 1]     

[13] Dong N, Yang X, Ye L, Chen K, Chan EW-C, Yang M, et al. (2020).

Genomic and protein structure modelling analysis depicts the origin and infectivity of 2019-nCoV, a new coronavirus which caused a pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China

. bioRxiv, preprint.

[本文引用: 1]     

[14] Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. (2020).

Genomic characterization and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding

. Lancet, 395: 563-74.

[本文引用: 1]     

[15] Ji W, Wang W, Zhao X, Zai J, Li X (2020).

Homologous recombination within the spike glycoprotein of the newly identified coronavirus may boost cross-species transmission from snake to human

. J Med Virol, 92-4.

[本文引用: 1]     

[16] Atluri S, Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA (2020).

Expanded Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UC-MSCs) as a Therapeutic Strategy In Managing Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: The Case for Compassionate Use

. Pain Physician, 23:71-83.

[本文引用: 2]     

[17] Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis ML, et al. (2004).

Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus: A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis

. J Pathol, 203:631-37.

[本文引用: 1]     

[18] Vergano M, Bertolini G, Giannini A, Gristina G, Livigni S, Mistraletti G, Petrini F (2020).

Clinical ethics recommendations for admission to intensive treatments and for their suspension, in exceptional conditions of imbalance between needs and available resources

. SIAARTI Press Release, 1: 58.

[本文引用: 1]     

[19] Leng Z, Zhu R, Hou W (2020).

Transplantation of ACE2 Mesenchymal stem cells improves the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

. Aging Dis, 11:216-228.

[本文引用: 3]     

[20] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. (2020).

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

. Lancet, 395:497-506.

[本文引用: 2]     

[21] D’Elia RV, Harrison K, Oyston PC, Lukaszewski RA, Clark GC (2013).

Targeting the “Cytokine Storm” for Therapeutic Benefit

. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 20(3):319-27.

[本文引用: 2]     

[22] Golchin A, Seyedjafari E, Ardeshirylajimi A (2020).

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for COVID-19: Present or Future

. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 13: 1-7. Epub ahead of print.

[本文引用: 1]     

[23] Mehta P, Mcauley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson J, et al. (2020).

Correspondence COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression

. Lancet, 6736(20) 19-20.

[本文引用: 1]     

[24] Ben Addi A, Lefort A, Hua X, Libert F, Communi D, Ledent C, et al. (2008).

Modulation of murine dendritic cell function by adenine nucleotides and adenosine: involvement of the A(2B) receptor

. European Journal of Immunology, 38: 1610-20.

[本文引用: 1]     

[25] Lu X, Pan J, Tao J, Guo D (2011).

SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein antagonizes IFN-beta response by targeting initial step of IFN-beta induction pathway, and its C-terminal region is critical for the antagonism

. Virus Genes, 42: 37-45.

[本文引用: 1]     

[26] Channappanavar R, Perlman S (2017).

Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology

. Seminars in Immunopathology, 39: 529-39.

[本文引用: 1]     

[27] Petit-Zeman S (2001).

Regenerative medicine

. Nat Biotechnol, 19:201-206.

[本文引用: 1]     

[28] Humes HD (2005).

Stem cells: the next therapeutic frontier

. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 116: 167-184.

[本文引用: 1]     

[29] Bianco P, Robey PG (2001).

Stem cells in tissue engineering

. Nature, 414:118-21.

[本文引用: 1]     

[30] Freed CR, Greene PE, Breeze RE, Tsai WY, Du Mouchel W, Kao R, et al. (2001).

Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease

. N Engl J Med, 344(10):710-9.

[本文引用: 1]     

[31] Hage`ge AA, Carrion C, Menasche P, Vilquin JT, Duboc D, Marolleau JP, et al. (2003).

Viability and differentiation of autologous skeletal myoblast grafts in ischaemic cardiomyopathy

. Lancet, 361:491-92.

[本文引用: 1]     

[32] Watanabe FD, Mullon CJ, Hewitt WR, Arkadopoulos N, Kahaku E, Eguchi S, et al. (1997).

Clinical experience with a bioartificial liver in the treatment of severe liver failure. A phase I clinical trial

. Ann Surg, 225:484-91.

[33] Humes HD, Weitzel WF, Bartlett RH, Swaniker FC, Paganini EP (2003).

Renal cell therapy is associated with dynamic and individualized responses in patients with acute renal failure

. Blood Purif, 21:64-7.

[本文引用: 1]     

[34] Behnke J, Kremer S, Shahzad T, et al. (2020).

MSC-based therapies-new perspectives for the injured lung

. J Clin Med, 3:9.

[本文引用: 3]     

[35] Li D, Liu Q, Qi L, Dai X, Liu H, Wang Y (2016).

Low levels of TGF-β1 enhance human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell fibronectin production and extend survival time in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury

. Mol Med Rep, 14:1681-1692.

[36] Iyer SS, Co C, Rojas M (2009).

Mesenchymal stem cells and inflammatory lung diseases

. Panminerva Med, 51:5-16.

[37] Manchikanti L, Centeno CJ, Atluri S, et al. (2020).

Bone marrow concentrate (BMC) therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: Evidence-based policy position statement of American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP)

. Pain Physician, 23: 83-129.

[本文引用: 2]     

[38] Chen J, Hu C, Chen L, Tang L, Zhu Y, Xu X, Chen L, Gao H, Lu X, Yu L et al. (2020).

Clinical study of mesenchymal stem cell treating acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by epidemic Influenza A (H7N9) infection, a hint for COVID-19 treatment

. Engineering, 10: 1016.

[本文引用: 1]     

[39] Khoury M, Alcayaga MF, Illanes SE, Figueroa FE (2014).

The promising potential of menstrual stem cells for antenatal diagnosis and cell therapy

. Front Immunol, 5:205.

[40] Chen L, Qu J, Cheng T, Chen X, Xiang C (2019).

Menstrual blood-derived stem cells: toward therapeutic mechanisms, novel strategies, and future perspectives in the treatment of diseases

. Stem Cell Res Ther, 10:406.

[41] Chen L, Qu J, Xiang C (2019).

The multi-functional roles of menstrual blood-derived stem cells in regenerative medicine

. Stem Cell Res Ther, 10(1):1-10.

[本文引用: 1]     

[42] GolchinA, FarahanyT, KhojastehA, SoleimanifarF, ArdeshirylajimiA (2018).

The clinical trials of Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in skin diseases: An update and concise review

. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther, 14(1) 22-33.

[本文引用: 1]     

[43] Yu B, Zhang X, Li X (2014).

Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells

. Int J Mol Sci, 15: 4142-57.

[本文引用: 1]     

[44] Zhang B, Shen L, Shi H, Pan Z, WuL, Yan Y, et al. (2016).

Exosomes from Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Identification, Purification, and Biological Characteristics

. Stem Cells International, 1929536: 1-11.

[本文引用: 1]     

[45] Sun L, Xu R, Sun X, Quian Y, Han Y, Zhu W, et al. (2016).

Safety evaluation of exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cell

, Cytotherapy, 18: 413-422.

[本文引用: 1]     

[46] Gatti S, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, Sordi A, Cantaluppi V, Tetta C, et al. (2011).

Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischaemia-reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury

. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 26:1474-1483.

[本文引用: 1]     

[47] Zhou Y, Xu H, Xu W, Wang B, Wu H, Tao Y, et al. (2013).

Exosomes released by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells protect against cisplatin-induced renal oxidative stress and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro

. Stem Cell Res Ther, 4:34.

[本文引用: 1]     

[48] Rahmani B, Tielsch J, Katz J, Gottsch J, et al. (1996).

The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. The Baltimore eye survey

. Ophthalmology, 103: 1721-1726.

[本文引用: 1]     

[49] Kelly NE, Wendel RT (1991).

Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes: Results of a pilot study, Arch

. Ophthalmol, 109:654-659.

[本文引用: 1]     

[50] Iwata N, Higuchi M, Saido TC (2005).

Metabolism of amyloid-beta peptide and Alzheimer’s disease

. Pharmacol, 108:129-148.

[本文引用: 1]     

[51] Krause DL, Muller N (2010).

Neuroin?ammation, microglia and implications for antiin?ammatory treatment in Alzheimer’s disease

, Int J Alzheimers Dis, 732806:1-9.

[本文引用: 1]     

[52] Brown GC (2007).

Mechanisms of in?ammatory neurodegeneration: iNOS and NADPH oxidase, Biochem

. Soc Trans, 35: 1119-1121.

[本文引用: 1]     

[53] Bellora F, Castriconi R, Dondero A, Reggiardo G, Moretta L, Mantovani A, et al. (2010).

The interaction of human natural killer cells with either unpolarized or polarized macrophages results in different functional outcomes

, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 107: 21659-21664.

[本文引用: 1]     

[54] Hare JM, Traverse JH, Henry TD, Dib N, Strumpf RK, Schulman SP, et al. (2009).

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of intravenous adult human mesenchymal stem cells (prochymal) after acute myocardial infarction

, J Am Coll Cardiol, 54: 2277-2286.

[本文引用: 1]     

[55] Vassalli G, Moccetti T (2011).

Cardiac repair with allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction

. Swiss Med Wkly, 141: 13209.

[本文引用: 1]     

[56] Golchin A, Farahany TZ (2019).

Biological products: Cellular therapy and FDA approved products

. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 15(2): 1-10.

[本文引用: 1]     

[57] Williams R (2020).

Are Mesenchymal Stem Cells a Promising Treatment for COVID-19?

The Scentst Magazine, 19-67402.

[本文引用: 1]     

[58] Wood C (2020).

First cell treatment to fight the coronavirus awaits FDA approval for clinical trial

. CNBC Broadcast, 3-31.

[本文引用: 1]     

[59] Ji F, Li Y, Li Z, Jin Y, Liu W (2019).

Stem cells as a potential treatment for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease

. Stem Cells Transl Med, 1-2.

[60] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. (2020).

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan China

. Lancet, 395:497-506.

[本文引用: 2]     

[61] Xie L, Liu Y, Fan B, et al. (2005).

Dynamic changes of serum SARS-coronavirus IgG, pulmonary function and radiography in patients recovering from SARS after hospital discharge

. Respir Res, 6:5.

[本文引用: 1]     

[62] Russell B, Moss C, George1 G, Santaolalla A, Cope A, Papa S, Van Hemelrijck M (2020).

Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19—a systematic review of current evidence

. ECancer, 14:1022.

[本文引用: 1]     

[63] Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, Webber DJ, Patani R, Michell AW, et al. (2012).

Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study

. Lancet Neurology, 11:150156.

[本文引用: 1]     

[64] Wilson JG, Liu KD, Zhuo NJ, Caballero L, McMillan M, Fang XH, et al. (2015).

Mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells for treatment of ARDS: a phase 1 clinical trial

. Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 3:24-32.

[本文引用: 2]     

[65] Hashmi S, Ahmed M, Murad MH, Litzow MR, Adams RH, Ball LM, et al. (2016).

Survival after mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

. Lancet Haematology, 3: 45-52.

[本文引用: 1]     

[66] Kamen DL, Nietert PJ, Wang H, Duke T, Cloud C, Robinson A, et al. (2018).

Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with SLE: results of an open-label phase I study

. Lupus, 5(Suppl 2):1-81.

[本文引用: 1]     

[67] Shetty AK (2020).

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Infusion Shows Promise for Combating Coronavirus (COVID-19)- Induced Pneumonia

. Aging Dis, 11(2): 462-464.

[本文引用: 1]     

[68] Ozdemir AT, Ozdemir RB, Kirmaz C, Sarıboyaci AE, Halbutog, llarıeZSU, Ozel C, Karaoz E (2016).

The paracrine immunomodulatory interactions between the human dental pulp derived mesenchymal stem cells and CD4 T cell subsets

. Cellular Immunology, 310: 108-15.

[本文引用: 1]     

[69] Kong D, Liu X, Li X, Hu J, Li X, Xiao J (2019).

Mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved treatment effects of Linezolid on severe pneumonia in a rabbit model

. Bioscience Reports, 39(2455): 1-15.

[本文引用: 1]     

[70] Marshall G (1948).

Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis—a medical research council investigation

. British Medical Journal, 2: 769-82.

[本文引用: 1]     

[71] Bondemark L, Ruf S (2015).

Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy?

European Journal of Orthodontics, 37(5): 457-61.

[本文引用: 1]     

[72] Leng Z, Zhu R, Hou W, Feng Y, Yang Y, Han Q (2020).

Transplantation of ACE2- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves the Outcome of Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

. Aging Dis, 11(2): 216-28.

[本文引用: 3]     

[73] Yang N, Shen HM (2020).

Targeting the Endocytic Pathway and Autophagy Process as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in COVID-19

. Int J Biol Sci, 16:1774-31.

[本文引用: 1]     

[74] Zhao RC (2020).

Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Coronavirus Disease 2019

. Stem Cells and Development, 29(11): 679-81.

[本文引用: 1]     

[75] Matthay MA, Calfee CS, Zhuo H, Thompson BT, Wilson JG, Levitt JE, et al. (2019).

Treatment with allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells for moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (START study): a randomised phase 2a safety trial

. Lancet Respir Med, 7(2):154-62.

[76] Simonson OE, Mougiakakos D, Heldring N, Bassi G, Johansson HJ, Dalen M, et al. (2015).

In vivo effects of mesenchymal stromal cells in two patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

. Stem Cells Transl Med, 4(10):1199-213.

[本文引用: 1]     

[77] Sun J, He WT, Wang L, Lai A, Ji X, Zhai X, et al. (2020).

COVID-19: Epidemiology, Evolution, and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives

. Trends Mol Med, 26(5): 483-495.

[本文引用: 1]     

[78] Lupia T, Scabini S, Pinna SM, Di Perri G, De Rosa FG, Corcione S (2020).

2019-novel Coronavirus Outbreak: A New Challenge

. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 21:22-27.

[本文引用: 1]     

[79] Wang LS, Wang YR, Ye DW, Liu QQ (2020).

A review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) based on current evidence

. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 12:43.

[本文引用: 1]     

[80] Zhang B, Zhang J, Chen H, Yang K, Zhang S (2020).

Unmatched clinical presentation and chest CT manifestation in a patient with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 10(4):871-873.

[本文引用: 1]     

[81] Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, Zhao J, Liu H, Peng Jet al. (2020).

Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. The British Infection Association

. J Infect, 15:12.

[本文引用: 1]     

/