Please wait a minute...
 Home  About the Journal Editorial Board Aims & Scope Peer Review Policy Subscription Contact us
 
Early Edition  //  Current Issue  //  Open Special Issues  //  Archives  //  Most Read  //  Most Downloaded  //  Most Cited
Aging and disease    2016, Vol. 7 Issue (1) : 45-52     DOI: 10.14336/AD.2015.0914
Original Article |
Quality of Life Impact Related to Foot Health in a Sample of Older People with Hallux Valgus
López López Daniel1,*, Callejo González Lucía1, Elena Losa Iglesias Marta2, Luis Saleta Canosa Jesús1, Rodríguez Sanz David3, Calvo Lobo Cesar3, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo Ricardo4
1 Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, Spain
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain
3 Department, Faculty of Health, Exercise and Sport, European University of Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
4 School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Download: PDF(653 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Hallux Valgus (HV) is a highly prevalent forefoot deformity in older people associated with progressive subluxation and osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and it is believed to be associated with varying degrees of HV effect on the quality of life related to foot health.The aim of this study is to compare the impact of varying degrees of HV on foot health in a sample of older people. The sample consisted of 115 participants, mean age 76.7 ± 9.1, who attended an outpatient center where self-report data were recorded. The degree of HV deformity was determined in both feet using the Manchester Scale (MS) from stage 1 (mild) to 4 (very severe). Scores obtained on the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) were compared. This has 13 questions that assess 4 health domains of the feet, namely pain, function, general health and footwear. The stage 4 of HV shown lower scores for the footwear domain (11.23 ± 15.6); general foot health (27.62 ± 19.1); foot pain (44.65 ± 24.5); foot function (53.04 ± 27.2); vigour (42.19 ± 16.8); social capacity (44.46 ± 28.1); and general health (41.15 ± 25.5) compared with stage 1 of HV (P<0.05) and there were no differences of physical activity (62.81 ± 24.6). Often, quality of life decreases in the elderly population based in large part on their foot health. There is a progressive reduction in health in general and foot health with increasing severity of hallux valgus deformity which appears to be associated with the presence of greater degree of HV, regardless of gender.

Keywords Foot Deformities      Foot diseases      Hallux Valgus      Musculoskeletal Diseases      Quality of Life.     
Corresponding Authors: López López Daniel   
About author:

These authors equally contribute this work

Issue Date: 01 February 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
López López Daniel
Callejo González Lucía
Elena Losa Iglesias Marta
Luis Saleta Canosa Jesús
Rodríguez Sanz David
Calvo Lobo Cesar
Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo Ricardo
Cite this article:   
López López Daniel,Callejo González Lucía,Elena Losa Iglesias Marta, et al. Quality of Life Impact Related to Foot Health in a Sample of Older People with Hallux Valgus[J]. Aging and disease, 2016, 7(1): 45-52.
URL:  
http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2015.0914     OR     http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/Y2016/V7/I1/45
DomainItemTheoretical ConstructMeaning of Lowest Score (0)Meaning of Highest Score (100)
Foot pain4Type, severity and duration.
Evaluation of foot pain in terms of type of pain, severity and duration.
Extreme pain in the feet and significant if acute in nature.Free from pain, no discomfort
Foot function4Evaluation of the feet in terms of impact on physical functions.Severely limited for the performance of numerous physical activities due to their feet, such as walking, working and moving about.Patients are able to carry out all physical activities desired, such as walking, working and climbing stairs.
General foot health2Self-perception of the feet (assessment of body image with respect to feet).Perception of poor condition and status of the feet.Perception of excellent condition and status of the feet.
Footwear3Lifestyle relating to footwear and feet.Great limitations to find suitable footwear.No problem obtaining suitable footwear. No limitations with respect to footwear.
Table 1  Basic domains of foot health assessed by the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Section 1 domains.

1.What level of foot pain have you had during the past week?

2.How often have you had foot pain?

3.How often did your feet ache?

4.How often did you get sharp pains in your feet?

5.Have your feet caused you to have difficulties in your work or activities?

6.Were you limited in the kind of work you could do because of your feet?

7.How much does your foot health limit you walking?

8.How much does your foot health limit you climbing stairs?

9.How would you rate your overall foot health?

10.It is hard to find shoes that do not hurt my feet.

11.I have difficulty in finding shoes that fit my feet.

12.I am limited in the number of shoes I can wear.

13.In general, what condition would you say your feet are in?

Table 2  13 questions of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire that assess 4 health domains of the feet: pain, function, general health and footwear.
DomainTheoretical ConstructMeaning of Lowest Score (0)Meaning of Highest Score (100)
General healthEvaluation of subject´s self-reportedhealth status.Poor perception of helth status.Very good general health status.
Physical activityEvaluation of ability in terms of impact on physical function.Severely limited in performing a broad raange of physical activities.Can perform all desired physical activitues with no impairment or disability.
Social CapacitySelf-perceptions of ability to socially interact.Limited ability to interact without problems, socially isolated.Good ability to interact socially and experience no isolation.
VigorLifestyle issues to perceived energyand activity participation.Lacks energy to do things.No problems with energy levels.
Table 3  Definitions of the Foot Health Questionnaire. Section 2 Domains.

14. In general, how would you rate your health?

15. The following questions ask about activities you might do during a typical day. Does your health now limit you in these activities?

a. Vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, or (if you wanted to) your ability to participate in strenuous sports.

b. Moderate activities, such as cleaning the house, lifting a chair, playing golf or swimming.

c. Lifting or carrying bags of shopping.

d. Climbing a steep hill.

e. Climbing one flight of stairs.

f. Getting up from a sitting position.

g. Walking more than a kilometer.

h. Walking one hundred meters.

i. Showering or dressing yourself.

16. To what extent has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors or social groups?

17. These questions are about how you feel during the past month. For each question, please give the one answer that comes closest. How much of the time during the past 4 weeks:

a. Did your feet get tired?

b. Did you have a lot of energy?

c. Did your feet feel worn out?

d. Did you feel full of life?

18. During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has your emotional problems or physical health interfered with your social activities (like visiting with friends, relatives, etc.)?

19. How true or false is each of the following statements for you?

a. I seem to get sick a little easier than other people.

b. I am as healthy as anybody I know.

c. I expect my health to get worse.

d. My health is excellent

Table 4  Questions of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire that assess section 2 domains
Total Group
Mean ± SD Range N= 115
Male
Mean ± SD Range N= 43
Female
Mean ± SD Range N= 72
P Value
Male vs. Female
Age, years76.70 ± 9.1
(65-96)
75.58 ± 9.18
(65 -96)
77.38 ± 9.02
(65-94)
0.308
Weight (kg)71.38 ± 12.1
(48-105)
77.35 ± 10.17
(53-104)
67.82 ± 11.81
(48-105)
0.000
Height (cm)163.96 ± 7.24
(150-183)
169.16 ± 5.2
(156-183)
160.86 ± 6.48
(150-177)
0.001
BMI (kg/m2)26.96 ± 6.62
(17.93 - 82)
28.18 ± 9.01
(18.78 - 82)
26.93 ± 4.56
(17.93 - 38.57)
0.220
Level of education0.80 ± 0.82
(0-3)
0.95 ± 0.9
(0-3)
0.71 ± 0.76
(0-3)
0.001
Table 5  Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample population.
HV 1
Mean (SD) Range N = 13
HV 2
Mean (SD) Range N = 44
HV 3
Mean (SD) Range N = 32
HV 4
Mean (SD) Range N = 26

P Value

Foot Pain

87.76 ± 6.1 (75-94)

71.28 ± 23.3 (13-100)

52.59 ± 30.0 (0-100)

44.65 ± 24.5 (6-94)

0.001
Foot Function85.31 ± 13.4
(50-100)
78.09 ± 20.7
(19-100)
58.69 ± 28.5
(6-100)
53.04 ± 27.2
(13-100)
0.005
Footwear57.54 ± 22.2
(17-83)
36.34 ± 25.9
(0-83)
31.22 ± 28.9
(17-83)
11.23 ± 15.6
(0-67)
0.001
General Foot Health84.69 ± 13.8
(60-100)
60.34 ± 29.3
(0-100)
45.59 ± 29.2
(0-100)
27.62 ± 19.1
(0-60)
0.001
General Health65.38 ± 15.1
(50-100)
55.45 ± 24.1
(10-90)
57.19 ± 22.6
(0-100)
41.15 ± 25.5
(10-90)
0.038
Physical Activity75.23 ± 17.9
(50-100)
66.21 ± 21.3
(17-100)
67.47 ± 22.5
(20-90)
62.81 ± 24.6
(6-100)
0.953
Social Capacity73.38 ± 12.4
(50-100)
68.66 ± 28.3
(0-100)
55.72 ± 30.6
(0-100)
44.46 ± 28.1
(0-100)
0.003
Vigor55.38 ± 12.1
(50-100)
49.91 ± 15.4
(19-88)
46.25 ± 15.3
(13-81)
42.19 ± 16.8
(13-88)
0.006
Table 6  Comparisons of FHSQ scores with varying degrees of HV.
[1] Menz HB (2008). Epidemiology of foot problems in older people. In: Hylton B Menz HB, editors. Foot problems in older people: Assessment and management. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1-11.
[2] Menz HB, Lord SR (2001). Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 91: 222-232.
[3] Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B (2010). Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res, 3:21.
[4] Dufour AB, Casey VA, Golightly YM, Hannan MT (2014). Characteristics Associated With Hallux Valgus in a Population-Based Foot Study of Older Adults. Arthritis Care Res, 66:1880-86.
[5] Golightly YM, Hannan MT, Dufour AB,et al. (2015). Factors associated with hallux valgus in a community-based cross-sectional study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 67: 791-798.
[6] Aiyer A, Stewart S, Rome K (2015). The effect of age on muscle characteristics of the abductor hallucis in people with hallux valgus: a cross-sectional observational study. J Foot Ankle Res, 30 May. [Epub ahead of print].
[7] Nguyen US, Hillstrom HJ, Li W,et al. (2010). Factors associated with hallux valgus in a population-based study of older women and men: the MOBILIZE Boston Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 18(1): 41-46.
[8] Cho NH, Kim S, Kwon DJ, Kim HA (2009). The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91: 494-498.
[9] Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M (2008). Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum, 59:857-862.
[10] Menz H, Morris M (2005). Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology, 51: 346-351.
[11] Thomas S, Barrington R (2003). Hallux Valgus. Current Orthopaedics, 17:299-307.
[12] Munuera Martínez PV, editor. El primer radio. Biomecánica y ortopodología. Santander: Exa Editores; 2012.
[13] Gilheany MF, Landorf KB, Robinson P (2008). Hallux valgus and Hallux rigidus: a comparion of impact on health related quality of life in patients presenting to foot surgeons in Australia. J Foot Ankle Res, 1:14-20.
[14] Sánchez Gómez R, Losa Iglesias ME, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R, editors. Estudio mediante campos electromagnéticos en la etiología del hallux abductus valgus Madrid: CERSA; 2015.
[15] Hecht PJ, Lin TJ (2014). Hallux valgus. Med Clin North Am, 98:227-232.
[16] Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Pérez-Soriano P, Llana-Belloch S, Leal-Muro A, Pedrera-Zamorano JD (2010). Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus. Gait Posture, 32:425-427.
[17] Bascarević ZLJ, Vukasinović ZS, Bascarević VD,et al. (2011). Hallux valgus. Acta Chir Iugosl, 58:107-111.
[18] Abhishek A, Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. (2010). Are hallux valgus and big toe pain associated with impaired quality of life? A crosssectional study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 18:923-926.
[19] Saro C, Jensen I, Lindgren U, Felländer-Tsai L (2007). Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Qual Life Res, 16:731-738.
[20] O'Leary CB, Cahill CR, Robinson AW, Barnes MJ, Hong J (2013). A systematic review: the effects of podiatrical deviations on nonspecific chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 26:117-123.
[21] Castro-Méndez A, Munuera PV, Albornoz-Cabello M (2013). The short-term effect of custom-made foot orthoses in subjects with excessive foot pronation and lower back pain: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Prosthet Orthot Int, 37:384-390.
[22] Steinberg N, Finestone A, Noff M, Zeev A, Dar G (2013). Relationship between lower extremity alignment and hallux valgus in women. Foot Ankle Int. 34:824-831.
[23] Lafuente G, Munuera PV, Dominguez G, Reina M, Lafuente B (2011). Hallux limitus and its relationship with the internal rotational pattern of the lower limb. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 101:467-474.
[24] Cho N H, Kim S, Kwon DJ, Kim HA (2009). The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91:494-498.
[25] Shih KS, Chien HL, Lu TW, Chang CF, Kuo CC (2014). Gait changes in individuals with bilateral hallux valgus reduce first metatarsophalangeal loading but increase knee abductor moments. Gait Posture, 40:38-42.
[26] Menz HB. Lord SR (2005). Gait instability in older people with hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int, 26:483-489.
[27] Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. (2006). Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 61:866-870.
[28] Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, Menz HB, Steele JR. (2009). ISB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2009: toe weakness and deformity increase the risk of falls in older people. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 24:787-791.
[29] Saro C, Jensen I, Lindgren U, Fellander-Tsai L (2007). Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Qual Life Res, 16:731-738.
[30] Gilheany MF, Landorf KB, Robinson P (2008). Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus: a comparison of impact on a health related quality of life in patients presenting to foot surgeons in Australia. J Foot Ankle Res, 1:1-14.
[31] Borman P, Ayhan F, Tuncay F, Sahin M (2012). Foot problems in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an unmet need for foot care. Open Rheumatol J, 6:290-295.
[32] Menz HB, Munteanu SE (2005). Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology (Oxford), 44:1061-1066.
[33] Garrow AP, Papageorgiou A, Silman AJ, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ (2001). The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 91:74-78.
[34] Nix S, Russell T, Vicenzino D, Smith M (2012). Measured on Digital Photographs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 42:642-648.
[35] Menz HB, Tiedemann A, Kwan MMS, Latt MD, Lord SR (2003). Reliability of clinical tests of foot and ankle characteristics in older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 93: 380-387.
[36] Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T (1998). Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 88:419-428.
[37] Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Dunne MP (2001). Health-related quality of life following podiatric surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91:164-173.
[38] Landor KB, Keenan AM (2002). An evaluation of two foot-specific, health-related quality-of-life measuring instruments. Foot Ankle Int, 23:538-546.
[39] Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 30:473-483.
[40] Bennet PJ, Patterson C (1998). The Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ): a new instrument for measuring outcomes of footcare. Aust J Podiatr Med 32: 87-92.
[41] Landorf KB, Radford JA (2008). Minimal important difference: values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. Foot, 18:15-19.
[42] Mitty E (2009). Nursing care of the aging foot. Geriatr Nurs, 30:350-354.
[43] Najafi B, de Bruin ED, Reeves ND, Armstrong DG, Menz HB (2013). The role of podiatry in the prevention of falls in older people: a JAPMA special issue. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 103:452-456.
[44] Cockayne S, Adamson J, Corbacho Martin B, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Hicks K,et al (2014). The REFORM study protocol: a cohort randomised controlled trial of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for the prevention of falls in older people, BMJ Open, Dec 17. [Epub ahead of print].
[45] Nix SE, Vicenzino BT, Smith MD (2012). Foot pain and functional limitation in healthy adults with hallux valgus: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 13:197
[46] Hurn SE, Vicenzino B, Smith MD (2015). Functional Impairments Characterizing Mild, Moderate, and Severe Hallux Valgus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 67:80-88.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
Copyright © 2014 Aging and Disease, All Rights Reserved.
Address: Aging and Disease Editorial Office 3400 Camp Bowie Boulevard Fort Worth, TX76106 USA
Fax: (817) 735-0408 E-mail: editorial@aginganddisease.org
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd