Please wait a minute...
 Home  About the Journal Editorial Board Aims & Scope Peer Review Policy Subscription Contact us
 
Early Edition  //  Current Issue  //  Open Special Issues  //  Archives  //  Most Read  //  Most Downloaded  //  Most Cited
Aging and disease    2019, Vol. 10 Issue (1) : 37-48     DOI: 10.14336/AD.2017.1202
Orginal Article |
Metformin and the Risk of Dementia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Chin-Hsiao Tseng1,2,3,*
1Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
3Division of Environmental Health and Occupational Medicine of the National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Download: PDF(607 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

This retrospective cohort study investigated dementia risk associated with metformin use in type 2 diabetes patients by using the reimbursement database of the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. The patients had new-onset diabetes during 1999-2005 and were followed up until December 31, 2011. An unmatched cohort of 147,729 ever users and 15,676 never users of metformin were identified, and a matched-pair cohort of 15,676 ever users and 15,676 never users was created by propensity score (PS). Hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression incorporated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using PS. Results showed that in the unmatched cohort, 713 never users and 3943 ever users developed dementia with respective incidence of 1029.20 and 570.03 per 100,000 person-years. The overall hazard ratio was 0.550 (95% confidence interval: 0.508-0.596). The hazard ratio for the first (<27.0 months), second (27.0-58.1 months) and third (>58.1 months) tertile of cumulative duration of metformin therapy was 0.975 (0.893-1.066), 0.554 (0.506-0.607) and 0.286 (0.259-0.315), respectively. Analyses in the matched cohort showed an overall hazard ratio of 0.707 (0.632-0.791) and the hazard ratio for the respective tertile was 1.279 (1.100-1.488), 0.704 (0.598-0.829) and 0.387 (0.320-0.468). In conclusion, metformin use is associated with a reduced dementia risk.

Keywords dementia      diabetes mellitus      metformin      Taiwan     
Corresponding Authors: Chin-Hsiao Tseng   
About author:

These authors contributed equally to work

Issue Date: 20 October 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Chin-Hsiao Tseng
Cite this article:   
Chin-Hsiao Tseng. Metformin and the Risk of Dementia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients[J]. Aging and disease, 2019, 10(1): 37-48.
URL:  
http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2017.1202     OR     http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/Y2019/V10/I1/37
Figure 1.  Flowchart showing the procedures followed in creating the unmatched original cohort and a cohort of 1:1 matched-pairs of metformin ever and never users from the reimbursement database of the National Health Insurance.
VariableUnmatched original cohortMatched cohort
Never usersEver usersNever usersEver users
(n=15676)(n=147729)PSD(n=15676)(n=15676)PSD
n%n%n%n%
Demographic data
Age* (years)63.4±10.461.6±10.0<0.01-17.8363.4±10.463.5±9.90.301.67
Sex (men)900957.478012354.24<0.01-7.18900957.47898557.320.78-0.56
Occupation
I614239.185806639.31<0.01614239.18608438.810.92
II312219.923411223.098.28312219.92315320.110.51
III330121.063060020.71-0.65330121.06331621.150.45
IV311119.852495116.89-8.58311119.85312319.920.02
Living region
Taipei521133.244651231.48<0.01521133.24529633.780.31
Northern158610.121657711.223.71158610.1214999.56-1.86
Central276917.662711518.351.88276917.66269117.17-1.27
Southern274617.522509816.99-1.49274617.52278017.730.65
Kao-Ping and Eastern336421.463242721.951.35336421.46341021.750.81
Major comorbidities
Hypertension1280481.6812073181.720.890.271280481.681283681.880.640.69
Dyslipidemia1129972.0812254982.96<0.0128.631129972.081129072.020.910.26
Obesity4242.7066764.52<0.019.964242.703892.480.21-1.29
Nephropathy535634.174010127.14<0.01-17.32535634.17529633.780.47-1.31
Eye diseases294218.774780332.36<0.0131.61294218.77266216.98<0.01-4.94
Stroke499631.874210128.50<0.01-8.08499631.87488531.160.18-1.49
Ischemic heart disease738447.106701845.37<0.01-3.60738447.10734846.870.68-0.30
Peripheral arterial disease355022.653774225.55<0.016.98355022.65355022.651.00-0.12
Antidiabetic drugs
Insulin12828.1834522.34<0.01-29.9012828.1810486.69<0.01-6.59
Sulfonylurea1146873.1610789673.040.755.131146873.161176875.07<0.015.32
Meglitinide12838.1857673.90<0.01-19.1712838.1812598.030.62-0.50
Acarbose174311.1280885.47<0.01-20.10174311.12169710.830.41-1.42
Rosiglitazone4642.9673885.00<0.0110.944642.964672.980.92-0.06
Pioglitazone3872.4739432.670.14-20.103872.473982.540.69-1.42
Commonly encountered comorbidities
COPD767548.967104448.090.03-2.12767548.96780749.800.141.86
Tobacco abuse4422.8259434.02<0.016.834422.824692.990.361.06
Alcohol-related diagnoses12317.85104907.10<0.01-4.1612317.8510876.93<0.01-3.77
Head injury5383.4355243.740.051.445383.435233.340.64-0.63
Parkinson’s disease5043.22
3349
2.27<0.01-6.26
504
3.22
504
3.221.000.10
Commonly used medications in diabetes patients
ACEI/ARB1085469.2410791173.05<0.018.811085469.241087969.400.76-0.30
Calcium channel blocker977162.338808359.62<0.01-5.62977162.33976762.310.960.41
Statin842853.769735865.90<0.0126.59842853.76830052.950.150.06
Fibrate533834.056381743.20<0.0120.06533834.05517032.98<0.05-1.41
Aspirin887156.599040061.19<0.019.87887156.59879756.120.40-2.07
Table 1  Characteristics of metformin never users and ever users in the unmatched original cohort and in the propensity, score matched cohort.
Metformin usenNPerson-yearIncidence rate (per 100,000 person-years)HR95% CIP value
Unmatched original cohort
Never users7131567669277.311029.201.000
Ever users3943147730691712.02570.030.550(0.508-0.596)<0.0001
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users7131567669277.311029.201.000
<27.0165748645168899.36981.060.975(0.893-1.066)0.5819
27.0-58.1136348872237111.30574.840.554(0.506-0.607)<0.0001
>58.192350213285701.36323.060.286(0.259-0.315)<0.0001
Matched cohort
Never users7131567669277.311029.201.000
Ever users5311567672593.50731.470.707(0.632-0.791)<0.0001
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users7131567669277.311029.201.000
<26.6226517117707.201276.321.279(1.100-1.488)0.0014
26.6-57.8180517524707.24728.530.704(0.598-0.829)<0.0001
>57.8125533030179.07414.190.387(0.320-0.468)<0.0001
Table 2  Incidence rates of dementia and hazard ratios by metformin exposure
ModelsnNHR95% CIP value
Excluding two consecutive prescriptions of metformin spanning more than 4 months
Never users713156761.000
Ever users1046497040.467(0.425-0.514)<0.0001
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users713156761.000
<27.0392160430.937(0.826-1.064)0.3174
27.0-58.1325136650.528(0.463-0.603)<0.0001
>58.1329199960.261(0.229-0.298)<0.0001
Excluding two consecutive prescriptions of metformin spanning more than 6 months
Never users713156761.000
Ever users1448659760.469(0.429-0.513)<0.0001
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users713156761.000
<27.0512194460.966(0.860-1.085)0.5606
27.0-58.1482190130.541(0.482-0.607)<0.0001
>58.1454275170.259(0.230-0.292)<0.0001
Excluding patients treated with incretin-based therapies during follow-up
Never users692147501.000
Ever users36151130900.655(0.604-0.711)<0.0001
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users692147501.000
<27.01580410311.072(0.979-1.173)0.1318
27.0-58.11241371530.650(0.592-0.713)<0.0001
>58.1794349060.349(0.315-0.387)<0.0001
Table 3  Sensitivity analyses estimating hazard ratios for dementia for ever versus never users of metformin in the original cohort.
YearEver users
Never users
HR95% CIP value
nNnN
Unmatched original cohort
1999793210337313350.562(0.442-0.714)<0.0001
2000704213097014730.588(0.460-0.752)<0.0001
2001639220898517260.514(0.410-0.645)<0.0001
20025352162410021100.485(0.392-0.600)<0.0001
20035022199710424110.511(0.414-0.632)<0.0001
20043972043012428730.456(0.373-0.558)<0.0001
20053761924715737480.507(0.420-0.611)<0.0001
Matched cohort
19999023047313350.588(0.432-0.801)0.0008
20008423297014730.659(0.480-0.906)0.0101
20019624208517260.725(0.541-0.971)0.0309
200259223110021100.529(0.383-0.730)0.0001
200369222310424110.697(0.514-0.945)0.0200
200455214212428730.611(0.445-0.840)0.0024
200549202715737480.624(0.453-0.861)0.0041
Table 4  Hazard ratios for dementia for ever versus never users of metformin estimated for each specific year from 1999 to 2005
[1] Shah H, Albanese E, Duggan C, Rudan I, Langa KM, Carrillo MC, et al. (2016). Research priorities to reduce the global burden of dementia by 2025. Lancet Neurol, 15: 1285-94.
[2] Li X, Song D, Leng SX (2015). Link between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease: from epidemiology to mechanism and treatment. Clin Interv Aging, 10: 549-60.
[3] Rojas-Gutierrez E, Muñoz-Arenas G, Treviño S, Espinosa B, Chavez R, Rojas K, et al. (2017). Alzheimer’s disease and metabolic syndrome: A link from oxidative stress and inflammation to neurodegeneration. Synapse.
[4] Huynh K, Martins RN, Meikle PJ (2017). Lipidomic profiles in diabetes and dementia. J Alzheimers Dis, 59:433-44.
[5] Rena G, Pearson ER, Sakamoto K (2013). Molecular mechanism of action of metformin: old or new insights? Diabetologia, 56: 1898-906.
[6] Wang YW, He SJ, Feng X, Cheng J, Luo YT, Tian L, et al. (2017). Metformin: a review of its potential indications. Drug Des Devel Ther, 11: 2421-9.
[7] Hsu CC, Wahlqvist ML, Lee MS, Tsai HN (2011). Incidence of dementia is increased in type 2 diabetes and reduced by the use of sulfonylureas and metformin. J Alzheimers Dis, 24: 485-93.
[8] Cheng C, Lin CH, Tsai YW, Tsai CJ, Chou PH, Lan TH (2014). Type 2 diabetes and antidiabetic medications in relation to dementia diagnosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 69: 1299-305.
[9] Kuan YC, Huang KW, Lin CL, Hu CJ, Kao CH (2017). Effects of metformin exposure on neurodegenerative diseases in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 79(Pt B): 77-83.
[10] Imfeld P, Bodmer M, Jick SS, Meier CR (2012). Metformin, other antidiabetic drugs, and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based case-control study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 60: 916-21.
[11] Ye F, Luo YJ, Xiao J, Yu NW, Yi G (2016). Impact of insulin sensitizers on the incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 41: 251-60.
[12] Ng TP, Feng L, Yap KB, Lee TS, Tan CH, Winblad B (2014). Long-term metformin usage and cognitive function among older adults with diabetes. J Alzheimers Dis, 41: 61-8.
[13] Moore EM, Mander AG, Ames D, Kotowicz MA, Carne RP, Brodaty H, et al. (2013). Increased risk of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes is associated with metformin. Diabetes Care, 36: 2981-7.
[14] Introduction to the National Health Insurance (in Chinese). https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=5C56DAE8D685EA0E&topn=FB01D469347C76A7 (last accessed November 28, 2017).
[15] Tseng CH (2017). Metformin and lung cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Oncotarget, 8: 41132-42.
[16] Tseng CH (2017). Metformin is associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort analysis. Diabetes Metab, 43: 438-45.
[17] D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Tutorial in Biostatistics: Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Non-Randomized Control Group, Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265-2281
[18] Tseng CH (2012). Diabetes, metformin use, and colon cancer: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Eur J Endocrinol, 167: 409-16.
[19] Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med, 34: 3661-79.
[20] Austin PC (2013). The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Stat Med, 32: 2837-49.
[21] Isik AT, Soysal P, Yay A, Usarel C (2017). The effects of sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, on cognitive functions in elderly diabetic patients with or without Alzheimer’s disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 123: 192-8.
[22] Markowicz-Piasecka M, Sikora J, Szydłowska A, Skupień A, Mikiciuk-Olasik E, Huttunen KM (2017). Metformin - a future therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Pharm Res.
[23] Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang B, Gong CX (2016). Targeting insulin signaling for the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Top Med Chem, 16: 485-92.
[24] Viollet B, Guigas B, Sanz Garcia N, Leclerc J, Foretz M, Andreelli F (2012). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview. Clin Sci (Lond), 122: 253-70.
[25] Koenig AM, Mechanic-Hamilton D, Xie SX, Combs MF, Cappola AR, Xie L, et al. (2017). Effects of the insulin sensitizer metformin in Alzheimer disease: pilot data from a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 31: 107-13.
[26] Nesti L, Natali A (2017). Metformin effects on the heart and the cardiovascular system: A review of experimental and clinical data. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 27: 657-69.
[27] Mostafa DK, Ismail CA, Ghareeb DA (2016). Differential metformin dose-dependent effects on cognition in rats: role of Akt. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 233: 2513-24.
[28] Pandey S, Garabadu D (2017). Piracetam facilitates the anti-amnesic but not anti-diabetic activity of metformin in experimentally induced type-2 diabetic encephalopathic rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 37: 791-802.
[29] Wang C, Yu JT, Miao D, Wu ZC, Tan MS, Tan L (2014). Targeting the mTOR signaling network for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Mol Neurobiol, 49: 120-35.
[30] Chen Y, Zhou K, Wang R, Liu Y, Kwak YD, Ma T, et al. (2009). Antidiabetic drug metformin (GlucophageR) increases biogenesis of Alzheimer’s amyloid peptides via up-regulating BACE1 transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106: 3907-12.
[31] Chiang MC, Cheng YC, Chen SJ, Yen CH, Huang RN (2016). Metformin activation of AMPK-dependent pathways is neuroprotective in human neural stem cells against amyloid-beta-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Exp Cell Res, 347: 322-31.
[32] Chen B, Teng Y, Zhang X, Lv X, Yin Y (2016). Metformin alleviated Aβ-induced apoptosis via the suppression of JNK MAPK signaling pathway in cultured hippocampal neurons. Biomed Res Int, 2016: 1421430.
[33] Simó R, Ciudin A, Simó-Servat O, Hernández C (2017). Cognitive impairment and dementia: a new emerging complication of type 2 diabetes-The diabetologist’s perspective. Acta Diabetol, 54: 417-24.
[34] Bonnefont-Rousselot D (2001). Antioxidant and anti-AGE therapeutics: evaluation and perspectives. J Soc Biol, 195: 391-8. (Article in French with English abstract).
[35] Jiang C, Li G, Huang P, Liu Z, Zhao B (2017). The gut microbiota and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 58: 1-15.
[36] Hur KY, Lee MS (2015). New mechanisms of metformin action: Focusing on mitochondria and the gut. J Diabetes Investig, 6: 600-9.
[37] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998). Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 352: 854-65.
[38] Albanese E, Launer LJ, Egger M, Prince MJ, Giannakopoulos P, Wolters FJ, et al. (2017). Body mass index in midlife and dementia: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 589,649 men and women followed in longitudinal studies. Alzheimers Dement (Amst), 8: 165-78.
[39] Lévesque LE, Hanley JA, Kezouh A, Suissa S (2010). Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes. BMJ, 340: b5087.
[1] Bae Jong Bin,Han Ji Won,Kwak Kyung Phil,Kim Bong Jo,Kim Shin Gyeom,Kim Jeong Lan,Kim Tae Hui,Ryu Seung-Ho,Moon Seok Woo,Park Joon Hyuk,Youn Jong Chul,Lee Dong Young,Lee Dong Woo,Lee Seok Bum,Lee Jung Jae,Jhoo Jin Hyeong,Kim Ki Woong. Is Dementia More Fatal Than Previously Estimated? A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study[J]. Aging and disease, 2019, 10(1): 1-11.
[2] Huang Poyin, Chen Cheng-Sheng, Yang Yuan-Han, Chou Mei-Chuan, Chang Ya-Hsuan, Lai Chiou-Lian, Chen Hsuan-Yu, Liu Ching-Kuan. REST rs3796529 Genotype and Rate of Functional Deterioration in Alzheimer’s Disease[J]. Aging and disease, 2019, 10(1): 94-101.
[3] Calvin Pak-Wing Cheng, Sheung-Tak Cheng, Cindy Woon-Chi Tam, Wai-Chi Chan, Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu, Linda Chiu-Wa Lam. Relationship between Cortical Thickness and Neuropsychological Performance in Normal Older Adults and Those with Mild Cognitive Impairment[J]. Aging and disease, 2018, 9(6): 1020-1030.
[4] Changhong Ren, Hang Wu, Dongjie Li, Yong Yang, Yuan Gao, Yunneng Jizhang, Dachuan Liu, Xunming Ji, Xuxiang Zhang. Remote Ischemic Conditioning Protects Diabetic Retinopathy in Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Rats via Anti-Inflammation and Antioxidation[J]. Aging and disease, 2018, 9(6): 1122-1133.
[5] Yao-Chih Yang,Cheng-Yen Tsai,Chien-Lin Chen,Chia-Hua Kuo,Chien-Wen Hou,Shi-Yann Cheng,Ritu Aneja,Chih-Yang Huang,Wei-Wen Kuo. Pkcδ Activation is Involved in ROS-Mediated Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Apoptosis in Cardiomyocytes Exposed to Advanced Glycation End Products (Ages)[J]. A&D, 2018, 9(4): 647-663.
[6] Yangqi Xu, Xiaoli Liu, Junyi Shen, Wotu Tian, Rong Fang, Binyin Li, Jianfang Ma, Li Cao, Shengdi Chen, Guanjun Li, Huidong Tang. The Whole Exome Sequencing Clarifies the Genotype- Phenotype Correlations in Patients with Early-Onset Dementia[J]. Aging and disease, 2018, 9(4): 696-705.
[7] Jie Zhen,Tong Lin,Xiaochen Huang,Huiqiang Zhang,Shengqi Dong,Yifan Wu,Linlin Song,Rong Xiao,Linhong Yuan. Association of ApoE Genetic Polymorphism and Type 2 Diabetes with Cognition in Non-Demented Aging Chinese Adults: A Community Based Cross-Sectional Study[J]. A&D, 2018, 9(3): 346-357.
[8] Tao Yan,Poornima Venkat,Michael Chopp,Alex Zacharek,Peng Yu,Ruizhuo Ning,Xiaoxi Qiao,Mark R. Kelley,Jieli Chen. APX3330 Promotes Neurorestorative Effects after Stroke in Type One Diabetic Rats[J]. A&D, 2018, 9(3): 453-466.
[9] Laia Perez-Roca,Cristina Adame-Castillo,Jaume Campdelacreu,Lourdes Ispierto,Dolores Vilas,Ramon Rene,Ramiro Alvarez,Jordi Gascon-Bayarri,Maria A. Serrano-Munoz,Aurelio Ariza,Katrin Beyer. Glucocerebrosidase mRNA is Diminished in Brain of Lewy Body Diseases and Changes with Disease Progression in Blood[J]. A&D, 2018, 9(2): 208-219.
[10] Jing Zou,Zhigang Chen,Caiqian Liang,Yongmei Fu,Xiaobo Wei,Jianjun Lu,Mengqiu Pan,Yue Guo,Xinxue Liao,Huifang Xie,Duobin Wu,Min Li,Lihui Liang,Penghua Wang,Qing Wang. Trefoil Factor 3, Cholinesterase and Homocysteine: Potential Predictors for Parkinson’s Disease Dementia and Vascular Parkinsonism Dementia in Advanced Stage[J]. A&D, 2018, 9(1): 51-65.
[11] Tien-Ching Lee,Pei-Shan Ho,Hui-Tzu Lin,Mei-Ling Ho,Hsuan-Ti Huang,Je-Ken Chang. One-Year Readmission Risk and Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery: A National Population-Based Study in Taiwan[J]. A&D, 2017, 8(4): 402-409.
[12] Xianglai Xu,Brian Wang,Changhong Ren,Jiangnan Hu,David A. Greenberg,Tianxiang Chen,Liping Xie,Kunlin Jin. Recent Progress in Vascular Aging: Mechanisms and Its Role in Age-related Diseases[J]. A&D, 2017, 8(4): 486-505.
[13] Xiaohua Li,Changhong Ren,Sijie Li,Rongrong Han,Jinhuan Gao,Qingjian Huang,Kunlin Jin,Yinghao Luo,Xunming Ji. Limb Remote Ischemic Conditioning Promotes Myelination by Upregulating PTEN/Akt/mTOR Signaling Activities after Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion[J]. A&D, 2017, 8(4): 392-401.
[14] Nopporn Thangthaeng,Margaret Rutledge,Jessica M. Wong,Philip H. Vann,Michael J. Forster,Nathalie Sumien. Metformin Impairs Spatial Memory and Visual Acuity in Old Male Mice[J]. A&D, 2017, 8(1): 17-30.
[15] Hong Zheng,Jinzi Wu,Zhen Jin,Liang-Jun Yan. Potential Biochemical Mechanisms of Lung Injury in Diabetes[J]. A&D, 2017, 8(1): 7-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © 2014 Aging and Disease, All Rights Reserved.
Address: Aging and Disease Editorial Office 3400 Camp Bowie Boulevard Fort Worth, TX76106 USA
Fax: (817) 735-0408 E-mail: editorial@aginganddisease.org
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd